Close Menu
footballworldhub.comfootballworldhub.com
    What's Hot

    NFL Team Scoring Per Drive & 2026 Regression Candidates

    Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026

    Newcastle Looking to Beat Man Utd and Tottenham to ‘Exceptional’ Defender

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • NFL Team Scoring Per Drive & 2026 Regression Candidates
    • Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026
    • Newcastle Looking to Beat Man Utd and Tottenham to ‘Exceptional’ Defender
    • Spain is the 2026 World Cup champion, defeating Argentina
    • Vi Redd
    • User:Bradlake14/TreeExplorerCustomSort.json: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia
    • User:Medical Nagaraj – Wikipedia
    • NFL Offensive Trends: Fantasy TE Production Heading Into 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    footballworldhub.comfootballworldhub.com
    • Home
    • World Cup
    • Players
    • Schedule
    • Clubs
    • Highlights
    • Results
    • Tournaments
    • Transfers
    footballworldhub.comfootballworldhub.com
    Home»Transfers»User talk:WikiAmateur303: Difference between revisions
    Transfers

    User talk:WikiAmateur303: Difference between revisions

    online.bizshow@gmail.comBy No Comments6 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    User talk:WikiAmateur303: Difference between revisions
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

     

    Line 91:Line 91:

    [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

    [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 16:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

    == Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:K.R. Harish|K.R. Harish]] (December 11) ==

    [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

    {{divbox|gray|3=This submission’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ”significant” coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ”published”, [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|”secondary”]] sources that are ”[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]” of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

    {{divbox|blue|3=Much of this draft is currently sourced to press releases. We require [[WP:INDY|independent]], [[WP:RS|reliable]] secondary sources to meet Wikipedia’s [[WP:N|inclusion criteria]].}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

    {{clear}}

    * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:K.R. Harish]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

    * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

    * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:K.R._Harish ”’Articles for creation help desk”’], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MCE89&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:K.R._Harish ”’reviewer’s talk page”’] or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

    [[User:MCE89|MCE89]] ([[User talk:MCE89|talk]]) 16:06, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

    Hi WikiAmateur303! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

    As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

    Learn more about editing

    Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

    If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

    Get help at the Teahouse

    If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

    Volunteer at the Task Center

    Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 01:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sksatsuma was:
     The comment the reviewer left was:

    Of the three reliable sources (excluding WP:IMDB), there is no significant coverage WP:SIGCOV. To demonstrate notability (WP:BIO), in-depth coverage from sources is generally required, rather than passing or trivial mentions.

    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

    sksatsuma 09:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Teahouse logo
    Hello, WikiAmateur303!
    Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! sksatsuma 09:52, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Information icon Hello, I’m Nubzor. I noticed that you recently removed content from Quick Gun Murugun without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nubzor [T][C] 16:48, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for your contributions to Gurmeet Singh (director). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest.
    I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

    Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
    When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Baqi:) (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

    WikiAmateur303 (talk) 15:43, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAmateur303 was:

    Significant improvements made to address earlier concerns. Added high-quality independent sources including Netflix newsroom and KRON4 industry profiles, expanded Recognition and Industry Coverage section, and replaced IMDb with reliable citations. The draft now demonstrates non-trivial, independent coverage sufficient for WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. Requesting reevaluation.

    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

    WikiAmateur303 (talk) 15:43, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: The comment the reviewer left was:

    The Times of India and IMDb are not reliable independent.

    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

    Theroadislong (talk) 16:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was: The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

    MCE89 (talk) 16:06, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Difference revisions talkWikiAmateur303 User
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWeek 15 Fantasy Football, All You Need To Know
    Next Article Draft:K.R. Harish: Difference between revisions
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Players

    User:Bradlake14/TreeExplorerCustomSort.json: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

    Schedule

    Piggybacking: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia

    Players

    Jay Bennett (author): Difference between revisions

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply

    Editors Picks

    User talk:Leghari’sLegacyMediaUnit: Difference between revisions

    Forbes NHL Valuations 2025 List: Most Valuable Hockey Teams

    WWE Fans Livid With Plan For Final Match vs Gunther

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microcabin: Difference between revisions

    Latest Posts
    Players

    NFL Team Scoring Per Drive & 2026 Regression Candidates

    Schedule

    Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026

    Players

    Newcastle Looking to Beat Man Utd and Tottenham to ‘Exceptional’ Defender

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

    Top Posts

    User talk:Leghari’sLegacyMediaUnit: Difference between revisions

    0 Views

    Forbes NHL Valuations 2025 List: Most Valuable Hockey Teams

    0 Views

    Perfection (disambiguation): Difference between revisions

    0 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Schedule

    User talk:Leghari’sLegacyMediaUnit: Difference between revisions

    Clubs

    Forbes NHL Valuations 2025 List: Most Valuable Hockey Teams

    Players

    WWE Fans Livid With Plan For Final Match vs Gunther

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    About Us

    Welcome to FootballWorldHub.com — your ultimate destination for everything football, updated automatically, accurately, and around the clock.

    At Football World Hub, we bring the global game closer to fans by delivering the latest news, match results, transfer updates, tournament coverage, and highlight content from trusted football sources worldwide.

    Our Picks

    NFL Team Scoring Per Drive & 2026 Regression Candidates

    Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026

    Newcastle Looking to Beat Man Utd and Tottenham to ‘Exceptional’ Defender

    News

    User talk:Leghari’sLegacyMediaUnit: Difference between revisions

    Forbes NHL Valuations 2025 List: Most Valuable Hockey Teams

    WWE Fans Livid With Plan For Final Match vs Gunther

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Get In Touch
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2026 footballworldhub. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.