Close Menu
footballworldhub.comfootballworldhub.com
    What's Hot

    NFL Team Scoring Per Drive & 2026 Regression Candidates

    Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026

    Newcastle Looking to Beat Man Utd and Tottenham to ‘Exceptional’ Defender

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • NFL Team Scoring Per Drive & 2026 Regression Candidates
    • Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026
    • Newcastle Looking to Beat Man Utd and Tottenham to ‘Exceptional’ Defender
    • Spain is the 2026 World Cup champion, defeating Argentina
    • Vi Redd
    • User:Bradlake14/TreeExplorerCustomSort.json: Difference between revisions – Wikipedia
    • User:Medical Nagaraj – Wikipedia
    • NFL Offensive Trends: Fantasy TE Production Heading Into 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    footballworldhub.comfootballworldhub.com
    • Home
    • World Cup
    • Players
    • Schedule
    • Clubs
    • Highlights
    • Results
    • Tournaments
    • Transfers
    footballworldhub.comfootballworldhub.com
    Home»Schedule»User talk:Eegnetwork: Difference between revisions
    Schedule

    User talk:Eegnetwork: Difference between revisions

    online.bizshow@gmail.comBy 3 Comments6 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    User talk:Eegnetwork: Difference between revisions
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

     

    Line 92:Line 92:

    [[User:Lynch44|Lynch]][[User talk:Lynch44|44]] 23:22, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

    [[User:Lynch44|Lynch]][[User talk:Lynch44|44]] 23:22, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

    == Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:AAB Bus Lines|AAB Bus Lines]] (February 23) ==

    [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

    {{divbox|gray|3=This draft’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

    * [[WP:ORGDEPTH|”in-depth”]] (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)

    * [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]]

    * [[Wikipedia:No original research#Secondary|”secondary”]]

    * [[WP:ORGIND|”strictly independent”]] of the subject

    Make sure you add references that meet ”all four” of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ”after they have been resolved”.

    {{clear}}

    * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:AAB Bus Lines]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

    * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

    * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:AAB_Bus_Lines ”’Articles for creation help desk”’], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:AAB_Bus_Lines ”’reviewer’s talk page”’] or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

    [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 08:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

    Hello, Eegnetwork, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to List of bus companies of the Philippines. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

    You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

    Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Jjpachano (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

    This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

    Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

    DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Teahouse logo
    Hello, Eegnetwork!
    Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

    Ibjaja055 (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GreenRedFlag was:

    This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

    Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

    GreenRedFlag (talk) 13:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lynch44 was:

    This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

    Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

     The comment the reviewer left was:

    Needs more than streaming platforms.

    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

    Lynch44 23:22, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

    This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

    Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

    Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

    DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    Difference revisions talkEegnetwork User
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleCrystal Palace Want Andoni Iraola After Oliver Glasner Sack Update
    Next Article 1904 Puerto Rican general election: Difference between revisions
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Schedule

    Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026

    Schedule

    Spain is the 2026 World Cup champion, defeating Argentina

    Schedule

    Vi Redd

    View 3 Comments

    3 Comments

    1. bet nacional aposta on March 19, 2026 5:43 pm

      Fazer aposta na Bet Nacional é tranquilo demais! Processo rápido e sem complicação. Pra quem busca praticidade, vale a pena: bet nacional aposta

    2. keo 88 on March 19, 2026 5:43 pm

      Keo 88, okay, heard of it. What are the odds like compared to others? That’s what I wanna know. keo 88

    3. keo88bet on March 19, 2026 5:44 pm

      Keo88bet, solid choice for sports betting. It’s straightforward and usually has competitive prices. Give it a look see. keo88bet

    Leave A Reply

    Editors Picks

    User talk:Leghari’sLegacyMediaUnit: Difference between revisions

    Forbes NHL Valuations 2025 List: Most Valuable Hockey Teams

    WWE Fans Livid With Plan For Final Match vs Gunther

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microcabin: Difference between revisions

    Latest Posts
    Players

    NFL Team Scoring Per Drive & 2026 Regression Candidates

    Schedule

    Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026

    Players

    Newcastle Looking to Beat Man Utd and Tottenham to ‘Exceptional’ Defender

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest sports news from SportsSite about soccer, football and tennis.

    Top Posts

    User talk:Leghari’sLegacyMediaUnit: Difference between revisions

    0 Views

    Forbes NHL Valuations 2025 List: Most Valuable Hockey Teams

    0 Views

    Perfection (disambiguation): Difference between revisions

    0 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews
    Schedule

    User talk:Leghari’sLegacyMediaUnit: Difference between revisions

    Clubs

    Forbes NHL Valuations 2025 List: Most Valuable Hockey Teams

    Players

    WWE Fans Livid With Plan For Final Match vs Gunther

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    About Us

    Welcome to FootballWorldHub.com — your ultimate destination for everything football, updated automatically, accurately, and around the clock.

    At Football World Hub, we bring the global game closer to fans by delivering the latest news, match results, transfer updates, tournament coverage, and highlight content from trusted football sources worldwide.

    Our Picks

    NFL Team Scoring Per Drive & 2026 Regression Candidates

    Greg Sankey touts nine-game football schedule at SEC Media Days 2026

    Newcastle Looking to Beat Man Utd and Tottenham to ‘Exceptional’ Defender

    News

    User talk:Leghari’sLegacyMediaUnit: Difference between revisions

    Forbes NHL Valuations 2025 List: Most Valuable Hockey Teams

    WWE Fans Livid With Plan For Final Match vs Gunther

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Get In Touch
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2026 footballworldhub. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.