User talk:Ell22Moore: Difference between revisions

:Thanks for clarifying and for your patience with me. I reverted my decline, so someone else will be able to review it now. [[User:SomeoneDreaming|SomeoneDreaming]] ([[User talk:SomeoneDreaming|talk]]) 02:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

:Thanks for clarifying and for your patience with me. I reverted my decline, so someone else will be able to review it now. [[User:SomeoneDreaming|SomeoneDreaming]] ([[User talk:SomeoneDreaming|talk]]) 02:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

::Thank you for your time and for informing yourself. I appreciate your help in getting this review moving along. [[User:Ell22Moore|Ell22Moore]] ([[User talk:Ell22Moore#top|talk]]) 03:09, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This has been in issue in the past at John Doyle (YouTube host). If you create another article that violates WP:BLP and WP:NPOV you will be topic banned from American politics and biographies of living people. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:34, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, if you add unsourced negative content, e.g. [1], you will be topic banned. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He’s tweeted anti-christian rhetoric in the past. Ell22Moore (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I perhaps cite it once I add it again? Ell22Moore (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There needs to be reliable secondary sources discussing it. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:13, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This warning has been logged here. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:41, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish: Thank you for the warning. I understand Wikipedia’s policies on BLP and attack pages. I want to clarify that my draft on Sam Parker is based entirely on reliable sources (ADL, IEHR, Utah Policy, Ballotpedia, FEC, Know Your Meme, Guardian, Salt Lake Tribune, Latin Times, Univision, and the Times of India). All claims made in the article are verifiable and cited. It does not include unsourced negative content on personal commentary; it reports well-documented events. If there are specific sections that appear non-compliant, I am willing to revise them so they are ensured to fully meet Wikipedia’s standards. Ell22Moore (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Calling someone a Holocaust denier sourced to a partisan organization that doesn’t actually say that, or only using negative coverage in passing mentions is unacceptable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:58, 17 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source I put actually includes a Twitter thread where Parker, in response to a post that listed things the op thought the Jews did and also said the “Holocaust is a Lie”, said “All True.” Ell22Moore (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s interesting what a basic 5 seconds of proofreading can do for you. Ell22Moore (talk) 00:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My intention was not to editorialize, but to summarize Parker’s documented public statements using his own words, as reported by secondary sources. If preferred, I am happy to rephrase the sentence to explicitly attribute the characterization (e.g., “According to IREHR, Parker endorsed a post claiming the Holocaust was a lie”) rather than using the label in Wikipedia’s voice. Ell22Moore (talk) 00:11, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:BLP, especially WP:BLPBALANCE. Also WP:COATRACK is worth a read. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I reviewed WP:BLP and WP:COATRACK. Based on the sources, the draft focuses on verifiable events in Parker’s life, and all controversial claims are attributed to reliable sources. Ell22Moore (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Someone. I replied to your comment. Ell22Moore (talk) 17:27, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ell22Moore. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timothy Buckley (priest), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SomeoneDreaming was:
 The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

SomeoneDreaming (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ell22Moore! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Despite it having 5 independent sources? Ell22Moore (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think that interviews are usually not independent enough for notability, but now I can’t find the policy to say that.

I do think that the coverage seems pretty routine, though. Do you have any more substantive sources–preferably not interviews? SomeoneDreaming (talk) 23:47, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you’re discussing the correct article because I don’t remember any of those sources being interviews. Ell22Moore (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m asking for clarity from some other AFC reviewers, thanks for your patience. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to clarify that the sources cited for Monica Garcia are not interviews under WP:INTERVIEW. While they include quotes from Garcia, the articles are written, edited, and published by independent journalists (e.g., Arizona Republic, BizTUCSON, Adweek). The journalists decide what content to include, provide context, and frame the narrative. Garcia’s words are embedded in independent reporting rather than self-published content. These sources meet the criteria for independent coverage, as they are not controlled by the subject and offer third-party reporting on her career. Although some of the coverage is routine career reporting, it is sufficiently independent and reliable to establish basic biography content. Ell22Moore (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying and for your patience with me. I reverted my decline, so someone else will be able to review it now. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 02:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time and for informing yourself. I appreciate your help in getting this review moving along. Ell22Moore (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]